The first question most exporters ask about payment is: which method should I use? The better question is: which method protects me without making me uncompetitive?
The answer depends on the market, the buyer, the relationship, and the size of the transaction. What it should never depend on is habit or optimism.
Open account means you ship the goods and invoice the buyer, who pays within agreed terms — typically thirty, sixty, or ninety days. You carry all the credit risk. If the buyer does not pay, you have shipped goods you no longer have and may never recover. Open account is the norm in established trading relationships in low-risk markets. It is not appropriate for a first transaction with an unknown buyer in a market you have not traded before.
Letter of credit is a payment undertaking issued by the buyer’s bank, guaranteeing payment to you provided you present compliant shipping documents. A confirmed letter of credit also carries a guarantee from your own bank, removing even the buyer’s bank risk from the equation. Letters of credit are operationally complex and carry bank charges on both sides. They are the right instrument when the buyer risk or country risk is significant enough to justify those costs.
Documentary collection sits between open account and letter of credit. You ship the goods and instruct your bank to release the shipping documents to the buyer’s bank only against payment or acceptance of a bill of exchange. You retain some control over the documents, but there is no bank payment guarantee. If the buyer refuses to pay or accept, you have goods at the destination port with no buyer and no easy way to recover them.
Advance payment is exactly what it sounds like: the buyer pays before you ship. This eliminates your credit risk entirely and is common for small first orders, custom-manufactured goods, or buyers in high-risk markets where no other instrument is practical. Many buyers will resist it, and some will refuse entirely. Where it is possible to negotiate, even partial advance payment reduces exposure significantly.
The choice of payment method is not a technicality. It is a commercial decision that directly determines your exposure on every transaction. The question is not which method is most convenient. It is which method reflects the actual risk profile of this buyer, in this market, at this stage of the relationship.
A practical framework: new buyer, new market, no prior relationship — letter of credit or advance payment. Established buyer, proven track record, low-risk country — open account on standard terms may be entirely reasonable. Somewhere in between — documentary collection, or open account with credit insurance, or a hybrid where the first one or two orders use a stronger instrument before moving to open terms once trust is established.
The transition from tighter to looser payment terms should be earned, not assumed. An exporter who moves a buyer to open account after a single successful transaction on letter of credit has made a logical error. One clean payment is not a credit history.
Credit insurance allows you to trade on open account while transferring the risk of non-payment to an insurer. The insurer assesses the buyer and the country, sets a credit limit, and pays a percentage of the outstanding debt if the buyer defaults. It enables you to offer competitive payment terms without taking on the full credit exposure yourself.
It is not a substitute for understanding who you are selling to. Credit insurance policies contain conditions and exclusions. An insurer who declines to cover a particular buyer is telling you something worth listening to, even if you proceed without cover.
A letter of credit is only as good as your ability to present compliant documents. Banks are not forgiving of discrepancies. A date that is one day outside the validity window, a description that does not match the credit exactly, a port of loading that differs by a single word from what is specified — any of these can result in a refusal to pay, even when the goods have shipped and the buyer is satisfied.
The discipline of reading a letter of credit carefully before accepting it, and of building your documentation process around the specific requirements of each credit, is one of the most valuable operational skills an export team can develop. It costs nothing except attention. The cost of getting it wrong can be substantial.
If understanding the payment risk environment of a specific market — what payment terms are standard, what the country risk factors are, and how they affect your exposure — is the decision in front of you, the R6 Market Risk Assessment covers exactly this ground: country risk profile, payment term norms, currency considerations, and the specific factors that affect payment security for UK exporters trading in that market.
If the priority is understanding the buyers themselves before deciding what terms to offer them, the R4 Buyer Intelligence Report profiles 25 named, active buyers in your target market with verified import history and commercial data — so your payment terms decision is based on what you know about the counterparty, not what you hope.
Next Step
Choose how you want to move forward.
Need something more tailored? Ask us about our bespoke consultancy →
Disclaimer: The information in this article is of a general nature only and is intended for educational purposes. It does not constitute professional trade, legal, or financial advice. Before making any export decisions, you should obtain advice specific to your product, market, and circumstances. TradeMatch Pro reports are intelligence tools, not regulated financial or legal advice.